QUESTIONS? CALL: 01582 262 070 (London & South) 0121 655 2400 (Midlands & North) info@morganwiseman.co.uk

Morgan Wiseman

  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • Contact
  • News & Events
MAKE A REFERRAL
  • Home
  • Immigration
  • Who Should Get to Stay in the UK review – the harsh reality of immigration
April 11, 2021

Who Should Get to Stay in the UK review – the harsh reality of immigration

Who Should Get to Stay in the UK review – the harsh reality of immigration

by a9jcbgg / Thursday, 13 June 2019 / Published in Immigration

A sobering selection of real-life tales illustrate the maddening network of rules and regulations that applicants to remain in the UK must navigate

Who Should Get to Stay in the UK (BBC Two) was not, alas, an amusing parlour game allowing one to strike through the names of those who are already here and whom one would prefer to kick out. (I have a list to hand, running from close family members, through personal nemeses, on to anyone mounting a leadership challenge and ending with all homeopaths.) It was the rather more sobering consideration of who, out of the 700,000 people from outside the EU who apply to remain here every year, the Home Office – operating via a network of rules and regulations so byzantine and in such constant flux that experts in the field describe themselves as “unsure of the law on any given day” – deems fit to stay.

The opening episode (the first of three) focused on four representatives of the main routes in. Valeriya, a 27-year-old Russian on her fifth student visa, has been given £200,000 from her father (“We are millionaires, not billionaires”) to start her own fashion business in order to qualify for an entrepreneur’s visa. Thirty-year-old Rashed developed Crohn’s disease while he was here as a student and has now outstayed his visa by five years while being treated on the NHS (for free, although this is technically in contravention of current rules). He has been refused leave to stay and is appealing on humanitarian grounds, because if he returns to his native Bangladesh he will not be able to access the treatments that keep him alive. Dillian, from Trinidad and Tobago, has already been shot once because of his status as a known gay man and is applying for asylum here. Ajmal is Scottish and applying for work visas for three Indian chefs who have the expertise he needs to expand his high-end restaurant and takeaway business.

The frustrations are legion. If, as the CEO of the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants Satbir Singh notes, the question of who is allowed in, is as often as not, an economic one, why is Ajmal hamstrung in his efforts to recruit three people who would, in effect, create more than 50 local jobs? He has tried for three years to find people with the requisite skills within the UK, but is barred from looking elsewhere because, although chefs are on the list of workers of whom we have a recognised shortage, anyone having anything to do with takeaway food is not. “Current legislation is … restrictive sometimes to the point of absurdity,” says his lawyer delicately. “All I’m looking for,” says Ajmal, speaking for anyone dealing with bureaucracy, “is a basic measure of common sense.”

Sometimes it is the clients who make life difficult for themselves. Valeriya can’t put a workable business plan together and Dillian (“A bit of a Walter Mitty character,” his lawyer says wearily) can’t stop overcomplicating his life story and distracting from the fact of his shooting and assured persecution if he is sent home.

But whatever the apparent factors in these decisions, the programme’s weaving together of personal stories and expert commentary gradually shows the more intangible mechanisms at work. Access to the UK depends on a strange brew of political expediency (who is the government pandering to and when); racism (in all its myriad and subtle hues, staining every layer of society and the institutions guarding and shaping it); economic considerations (including the duty to protect finite resources against chancers, so that they are there for the people who fund them); and human compassion. The brew’s toxicity rises and falls according to which elements are in the ascendant.

At the same time, the show made points rarely heard in mainstream discussions of immigration. Barrister Colin Yeo noted that the dominant narrative is of immigrants gobbling up an unfair share of some notional national pie, when what they actually do is increase the size of the pie itself. Others pointed out that there is no equivalent to the presumption of innocence in immigration law; each case stands on its own merits and is subject to laws so complex that how they are applied often looks like no more than whim.

Among the subjects here, justice appeared to be largely done in the end. Rashed and Dillian are staying. The Migration Advisory Committee showed a small measure of common sense and advised removal of the takeaway restriction. And Valeriya is waiting to hear if the Home Office reckons the UK needs another fledgling fashion business from someone with a lot of clothes but no plan. Rashed has had further surgery since filming, which suggests a death sentence was indeed averted. Sip your brew and wonder what it cost to save him, or what it would have cost us to send him back to die.

Original article available here: https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/jun/13/who-should-get-to-stay-in-the-uk-review-immigration

  • Tweet

About a9jcbgg

What you can read next

Crossing Divides – Immigration: Is Britain becoming less anxious?
Unqualified Immigration Adviser Sentenced
UK immigration: Time to abandon the Conservative target

Recent Posts

  • DCD Isn’t all of me

    Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) or Dy...
  • Unskilled Workers To Be Denied Visas, But What Does Unskilled Mean Anyway?

    Today it has been reported that under new plans...
  • #Jamaica50 The Immigration Injustice Continues

    I recently wrote an article on the current situ...
  • Cyprus rape case: a miscarriage of justice as old as time

    When a woman is raped, why should it be the fir...
  • Migration: A human rights issue.

    Article three of the Universal Declaration of H...

Archives

  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • July 2014

Categories

  • Children
  • Divorce
  • Domestic Abuse
  • Immigration

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Featured Posts

  • DCD Isn’t all of me

    0 comments
  • Unskilled Workers To Be Denied Visas, But What Does Unskilled Mean Anyway?

    0 comments
  • #Jamaica50 The Immigration Injustice Continues

    0 comments
  • Cyprus rape case: a miscarriage of justice as old as time

    0 comments
  • Migration: A human rights issue.

    0 comments

Make a referral

Please fill this form and we'll get a specialist in contact as soon as possible!

Referrer Details
Client Details

Privacy Policy

Legal Notices

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints Procedure
  • Enquiry Form Notice
  • GET SOCIAL
Morgan Wiseman

© 2019 All rights reserved.

Morgan Wiseman Solicitors Limited, company Registered in England and Wales Under Number 10731548. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Registered office: 66-68 Alma Street, Luton, Bedfordshire LU1 2PL (SRA No: 638355). Branches: 1142 Warwick Road, Acocks Green, Birmingham, West Midlands B27 6BL (SRA No: 648071); 618-620 Bearwood Road, Smethwick, Birmingham, B66 4BW (SRA No: 661078). A list of Directors and their respective specialist accreditation is available for inspection at its registered office.

TOP
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled

Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.

Non-necessary

Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.